Roster transition report built on native Statbase PVI math. The report shows where Paris Université Club already projects as D1-caliber, where depth is fragile, and what actions can convert a pitching-led base into stable competitive outcomes.
EXECUTIVE DASHBOARD
What PUC already is
Pitching-led team with real top-end impact.
This is not a survival-only roster if run prevention holds.
What can break the season
Depth offense + defense leakage.
Top-arm value gets wasted if conversion and glove stability lag.
What changes the ceiling
Watch-tier conversion into core roles.
Turn 1-2 watch profiles into reliable weekly contributors.
IMPACT PLAYERS
5
PVI 60+
CORE WATCH
6
PVI 50-59
REPLACEMENT RISK
7
PVI <45
NO SIGNAL
7
Not enough data yet
MEAN PVI
50.9
Median 50
HIGH-CONFIDENCE IMPACT
3
Reliable top core
SCORED PLAYERS
21
Actionable grading set
TEAM IDENTITY
Pitching-led
Run prevention first
Top-end pitching value
Evidence: Rolland/Lequeux profiles + impact-tier pitching base.
Protect by: Prioritize workload timing and leverage usage discipline.
Run prevention baseline
Evidence: ERA 3.04 (3/9), WHIP 1.41 (4/9), K/9 8.63 (4/9).
Protect by: Keep traffic management and strike-quality plans stable.
Game control floor
Evidence: Run differential +47 (3/9).
Protect by: Avoid self-inflicted runs through defensive slippage.
Offense depth conversion
HighEvidence: Team OPS .697 (6/9) with heavy output concentration.
Baseball cost: When top bats are neutralized, scoring collapses quickly.
Fix now: Stabilize one watch-tier bat role and add one OBP-stable profile.
Defensive run leakage
HighEvidence: FPct .924 (6/9) and multiple sub-.836 fielding marks.
Baseball cost: Pitching value is lost through extended innings and extra traffic.
Fix now: Targeted defensive role alignment and late-inning glove protection.
Depth uncertainty
MediumEvidence: 7 no-signal players and only 3 high-confidence impact profiles.
Baseball cost: Roster decisions become reactive under pressure.
Fix now: Use strict evaluation windows with binary keep/develop decisions.
TIER DISTRIBUTION
HOW TO READ THIS BOARD
1) Core reality: impact pitching is real now.
2) Pressure lane: watch/risk/no-signal depth is larger than impact group.
3) Action filter: every decision should ask if it protects run prevention and upgrades depth.
4) Coverage note: no-signal group 7; additional scored but unnamed 3.
DATA USED
2025 D2 + early 2026 D1 player data.
LEAGUE ADJUSTMENT
D2 output translated into D1 context.
SCORING
Native Statbase PVI only.
FINAL GRADE
Carryover blended with early D1 reliability.
Left chart: longer bars mean stronger league rank position.
K%
21.7%
BB%
16.6%
Green = impact, blue = watch, orange = risk.
Strength: pitching. Main leak: defense. Swing variable: offense depth.
OFFENSE LEADERS
ROLLAND DIAMOND Clyde
OPS .986 | PVI 68
Dussart Jerome
OPS .976 | PVI 74
DUSSART Julian
OPS .835 | PVI 51
PITCHING LEADERS
ROLLAND DIAMOND Clyde
51.7 IP | 1.57 ERA | 1.30 WHIP
LEQUEUX Ethan
41.0 IP | 1.76 ERA | 1.22 WHIP
LE GUILLOU Luca
31.0 IP | 11.32 K/9
DEFENSE RISK
LE GUILLOU Luca
FPct .667
ONSRI Nawapon Thomas
FPct .714
SOLLIEZ Basile
FPct .783
SOULIER Alexandre
FPct .800
Mesguich Camille
FPct .836
Most likely path today: base scenario unless depth upgrades land.
Ceiling
Strong upper-mid D1 profile
Base
Mid-table competitive profile
Floor
Bottom-tier pressure zone
PRIORITY 1
Protect Rolland/Lequeux workload and usage timing.
PRIORITY 2
Convert one watch-tier profile into stable core value.
PRIORITY 3
Fix defensive leakage in named high-risk pockets.
PRIORITY 4
Add one OBP-stable bat to de-risk lineup collapse.
PRIORITY 5
Use strict evaluation windows for no-signal players.
| Window | Focus | Owner | Success indicator |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30d | Pitching leverage management | Head coach + pitching coordinator | Top arms keep command and availability |
| 30-60d | Defensive cleanup | Defensive coordinator | Error and free-base leakage trend down |
| 60-90d | Middle-order OBP stability | Hitting lead + recruitment | Less dependence on top two bats |
| 90-120d | Watch/no-signal roster hardening | Front office + analytics | At least one watch profile becomes core |
| Decision question | Evidence needed | Owner | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which watch-tier player gets a stable core role first? | 30-day usage + production stability in one defined role. | Field staff + analytics | 30 days |
| Where is the highest defensive leakage concentration? | Error/extra-base outcomes by game state and alignment. | Defensive coordinator | 30 days |
| What is the preferred OBP acquisition profile? | Contact + chase + zone-discipline fit vs current lineup mix. | Front office | 45 days |
| Which no-signal players stay in active evaluation? | Defined window outcomes against role-specific checkpoints. | Head coach + front office | 60 days |