/ FD1 / PFI REPORT / WEEK 2 / 2026

FD1 Week 2 analytical report

Player Form Index report for France D1 through two weekends (Apr 4-5 and Apr 11-12). Includes league context, team board, player leadership, trend movement, and actionable short-window recommendations.

Data cut: Monday, April 13, 2026

Season scope: 2026 only

Games captured: 15

HOME REPORTS HUB FD1 TEAM INDEX

Scope and sample

Data cut: Monday, April 13, 2026. Scope: 2026 season only, through Apr 4-5 and Apr 11-12.

COMPLETED GAMES

MAPPED LOGS

372

RANKED PLAYERS

133

UNMATCHED ROWS

DATA INPUTS

Box scores (2026)PFI game logs (2026)PFI season table (2026)

Executive takeaways

Montpellier (MTP) remains the clear early leader: 4-0, +30 RD, 14.5 RPG, and top team season PFI average (5.791).

Rouen (ROU) is the strongest complete challenger: 3-1 with league-best run prevention (2.00 RAPG).

League environment is offense-forward and volatile: 13.33 R/G, only 13.3% one-run games, 46.7% decided by 5+.

Leaderboard inflation risk remains for low-game players; confidence is mixed (35 high-confidence, 47 low-confidence).

Current sample quality remains strong for this stage: 372 mapped logs, 133 ranked players, and only 4 unmatched rows.

League context and volatility

Early season profile is offense-forward with wide game-margin spread and mixed confidence depth.

RUN ENVIRONMENT

TOTAL RUNS

200

RUNS / GAME

13.33

MEDIAN MARGIN

GAME MARGIN MIX

One-run13.3%

2-4 runs40.0%

5+ runs46.7%

PFI DISTRIBUTION AND RATES

PFI MEAN

5.167

PFI MEDIAN

4.785

PFI P90

7.509

ELITE RATE

4.0%

HIGH-IMPACT RATE

10.5%

CONFIDENCE MIX (133 RANKED)

High35

Medium51

Low47

Team performance board

MTP

4-0

PFI: 5.791

RD: +30

RPG: 14.50

RAPG: 7.00

ROU

3-1

PFI: 5.329

RD: +17

RPG: 6.25

RAPG: 2.00

SEN

2-2

PFI: 5.101

RD: +9

RPG: 6.50

RAPG: 4.25

TOU

2-1

PFI: 5.180

RD: +1

RPG: 6.00

RAPG: 5.67

SAV

2-2

PFI: 4.868

RD: -3

RPG: 4.50

RAPG: 5.25

LAR

2-2

PFI: 4.937

RD: -10

RPG: 4.50

RAPG: 7.00

BEZ

0-3

PFI: 4.754

RD: -21

RPG: 5.33

RAPG: 12.33

PUC

0-4

PFI: 5.016

RD: -23

RPG: 5.25

RAPG: 11.00

Team	W-L	RD	RPG	RAPG	Team PFI Avg
MTP	4-0	+30	14.50	7.00	5.791
ROU	3-1	+17	6.25	2.00	5.329
SEN	2-2	+9	6.50	4.25	5.101
TOU	2-1	+1	6.00	5.67	5.180
SAV	2-2	-3	4.50	5.25	4.868
LAR	2-2	-10	4.50	7.00	4.937
BEZ	0-3	-21	5.33	12.33	4.754
PUC	0-4	-23	5.25	11.00	5.016

TEAM PFI AVG

Team identity mix

MTP

Offense-driven engine (~90% batting share), still winning despite higher Week 2 runs allowed.

ROU

Most complete challenger with the strongest run-prevention foundation.

SEN / TOU

Offense-led teams with enough pitching support to stay competitive.

SAV

Pitching-dependent profile with negative defensive drag in this sample.

BEZ / PUC

Offense flashes are present, but run prevention remains the main constraint.

Stable season form leaders (>=3 games)

1. BOUNIOL Dorian

7.75

MTP

4 G

Conf 0.850

2. DOAT Pierre

7.48

MTP

4 G

Conf 0.850

3. SORIANO Ariel

6.67

TOU

3 G

Conf 0.760

4. FARINA Patrick James

6.43

MTP

3 G

Conf 0.712

5. MEZA Adrian

6.20

BEZ

3 G

Conf 0.712

6. HARRISON Gabriel

6.10

ROU

4 G

Conf 0.850

7. BAMBERGER Ivan Jerome Alain

6.02

TOU

3 G

Conf 0.760

8. OUANYOU Jordan Sahie

5.96

PUC

3 G

Conf 0.760

9. BROSSIER Paolo

5.91

MTP

4 G

Conf 0.850

10. ZAN Mael

5.89

MTP

4 G

Conf 0.850

Rank	Player	Team	Season PFI	Games	Confidence
1	BOUNIOL Dorian	MTP	7.75	4	0.850
2	DOAT Pierre	MTP	7.48	4	0.850
3	SORIANO Ariel	TOU	6.67	3	0.760
4	FARINA Patrick James	MTP	6.43	3	0.712
5	MEZA Adrian	BEZ	6.20	3	0.712
6	HARRISON Gabriel	ROU	6.10	4	0.850
7	BAMBERGER Ivan Jerome Alain	TOU	6.02	3	0.760
8	OUANYOU Jordan Sahie	PUC	5.96	3	0.760
9	BROSSIER Paolo	MTP	5.91	4	0.850
10	ZAN Mael	MTP	5.89	4	0.850

Offensive engines (PA >= 15)

1. DOAT Pierre

0.500

MTP

2. BOUNIOL Dorian

0.489

MTP

3. BROSSIER Paolo

0.479

MTP

4. ZAN Mael

0.395

MTP

5. LOPEZ TEQUEDOR YORFRANK MANUEL

0.392

SEN

6. ESTEBAN Clement

0.391

LAR

Rank	Player	Team	battingImpact / PA
1	DOAT Pierre	MTP	0.500
2	BOUNIOL Dorian	MTP	0.489
3	BROSSIER Paolo	MTP	0.479
4	ZAN Mael	MTP	0.395
5	LOPEZ TEQUEDOR YORFRANK MANUEL	SEN	0.392
6	ESTEBAN Clement	LAR	0.391

Run-prevention aces (IP >= 10)

1. MERCADIER Thibault

8.787

ROU14.0 IP

2. PENA PEREIRA Adrian

7.847

SAV13.0 IP

3. PRIOUL Esteban

7.228

ROU12.1 IP

4. DELGADO QUINTANA Jesus Alexander

5.535

MTP11.0 IP

5. VERA Anderson

4.522

SEN12.0 IP

Rank	Player	Team	Pitching Impact	IP
1	MERCADIER Thibault	ROU	8.787	14.0
2	PENA PEREIRA Adrian	SAV	7.847	13.0
3	PRIOUL Esteban	ROU	7.228	12.1
4	DELGADO QUINTANA Jesus Alexander	MTP	5.535	11.0
5	VERA Anderson	SEN	4.522	12.0

Two-way value board

1. BROSSIER Paolo

10.979

MTP

2. LOPEZ TEQUEDOR YORFRANK MANUEL

7.802

SEN

3. DUSSART Jerome

7.501

PUC

4. POLIT Luc

4.361

MTP • Bat positive, pitch net neutral/negative

Rank	Player	Team	Total Two-way Impact
1	BROSSIER Paolo	MTP	10.979
2	LOPEZ TEQUEDOR YORFRANK MANUEL	SEN	7.802
3	DUSSART Jerome	PUC	7.501
4	POLIT Luc(Bat positive, pitch net neutral/negative)	MTP	4.361

Weekend risers

Largest PFI average gains (W2 vs W1)

Bar scale: relative delta in this list (100% = DUSSART Julian +3.526).

1. DUSSART Julian (PUC)

↑ +3.526

2. GONZALEZ Lorenzo (PUC)

↑ +2.626

3. DOAT Pierre (MTP)

↑ +2.205

4. BOUNIOL Dorian (MTP)

↑ +1.363

5. AMOROS Lilian (SAV)

↑ +1.353

Weekend drop-offs

Largest PFI average declines (W2 vs W1)

Bar scale: relative delta in this list (100% = BRAINVILLE Louis -5.002).

1. BRAINVILLE Louis (ROU)

↓ -5.002

2. BROSSIER Paolo (MTP)

↓ -3.493

3. NAYRAL Jason (MTP)

↓ -2.629

4. AMOROS Axel (SAV)

↓ -2.398

5. MAYEUX Dylan (SEN)

↓ -2.338

Team movement

Weekend 2 vs Weekend 1 team-weighted PFI deltas

Bar scale: relative absolute delta in this list (100% = BEZ +1.473).

BEZ

↑ +1.473

PUC

↑ +0.907

TOU

↑ +0.383

SEN

↓ -0.109

LAR

↓ -0.185

ROU

↓ -0.255

SAV

↓ -0.291

MTP

↓ -0.450

Next two-week recommendations

PRIORITY 1

MTP: protect rotation bridge and bullpen layering; RA drift is the main vulnerability.

PRIORITY 2

ROU: keep run-prevention identity; add controlled early-count aggression on offense.

PRIORITY 3

SEN: lean into two-way optimization around Lopez/Vera usage.

PRIORITY 4

TOU: maintain high-end starter leverage and avoid depth-inning overexposure.

PRIORITY 5

PUC/BEZ: priority is run-prevention floor and defensive cleanliness to convert close scripts.

PRIORITY 6

League scouting: track two-way workloads and reliever micro-stint variance weekly.

REPORTS HUB FD1 TEAM INDEX DOSSIER HOME