/ BCL EUROPE / GROUP FORECAST / ROTTERDAM + REGENSBURG / MAY 22-24 / 2026

BCL Europe 2026: two host groups, two clear favorites, and several live upset routes

Rotterdam opens with Tenerife Marlins and Regensburg opens with Guggenberger Legionäre as clear first-lane favorites. The operational edge is route control: stay out of extra-pressure scripts in a three-game round robin.

Group favorites

MAR 70.8% / REG 73.3%

Both groups start with a single high-separation favorite lane.

Event window

May 22-24

Two four-team groups in Rotterdam and Regensburg.

Forecast stack

Statbase math

Internal tournament math, TPM/PFI layers, benchmark translation, run shape, and pitch-depth stress.

Board size

8 clubs / 12 games

Single round-robin in each host group before knockout phase.

Home Reports hub Rotterdam schedule Regensburg schedule

Executive read

The favorite board is clear. The pressure board is not.

ROT / Neptunus Familiestadion, Rotterdam

Rotterdam Group

Tenerife Marlins separate as the favorite profile while Curacao Neptunus carries the main host-side chase lane. Heidenheim and Nettuno are live if the run environment compresses.

Window

May 22-24, 2026

Run env

5.51 runs/team-game

REG / Armin-Wolf-Baseball-Arena, Regensburg

Regensburg Group

Guggenberger Legionäre are both host-side and model favorite. Parma owns the strongest challenger lane while Draci Brno carries the pressure-upset route.

Window

May 22-24, 2026

Run env

4.95 runs/team-game

The forecast is pre-event and roster-proxy based as of May 19, 2026. Team identities and schedule are official WBSC context, while player-level layers still use current Statbase league rosters until official BCL roster tables are published.

Decision board

Group-winner and top-two equity by host

Headline probability layer from both analyst packets: rank, route equity, TPM/PFI stack, and benchmark translation bands.

ROT

Rotterdam Group

Neptunus Familiestadion, Rotterdam

5.51 runs/team-game

Tenerife MarlinsMAR / ESP#1

1st

70.8%

Top 2

89.3%

2.27

TPM / PFI

71 / 5.82

Elite continental outlier on both hitting and prevention translation.

Curacao Neptunus RotterdamNEP / HDK#2

1st

22.5%

Top 2

73.5%

1.78

TPM / PFI

70 / 5.76

Host-side challenger with a clean prevention profile that travels.

Heidenheim HeideköpfeHDH / DBL#3

1st

5.1%

Top 2

24%

1.14

TPM / PFI

62 / 5.48

Pressure team that likely needs one upset from the top pair.

A.S.D. Nettuno B.C. 1945NET / Serie A#4

1st

1.6%

Top 2

13.1%

0.81

TPM / PFI

60 / 5.29

Long-price team with a better prevention argument than headline odds imply.

Rank	Team	1st	Top 2	xW	TPM / PFI	PFI conf	Roster cov	Domestic hit/pitch	EU hit/pitch	Read
#1	TenerifeMAR / ESP	70.8%	89.3%	2.27	71 / 5.82	73%	49%	122.9 / 147.1	146.9 / 142.0	Elite continental outlier on both hitting and prevention translation.
#2	NeptunusNEP / HDK	22.5%	73.5%	1.78	70 / 5.76	76%	66%	119.4 / 135.3	112.9 / 132.9	Host-side challenger with a clean prevention profile that travels.
#3	HeidenheimHDH / DBL	5.1%	24%	1.14	62 / 5.48	76%	54%	108.2 / 113.0	110.8 / 114.0	Pressure team that likely needs one upset from the top pair.
#4	NettunoNET / Serie A	1.6%	13.1%	0.81	60 / 5.29	83%	86%	101.2 / 106.6	96.0 / 114.3	Long-price team with a better prevention argument than headline odds imply.

REG

Regensburg Group

Armin-Wolf-Baseball-Arena, Regensburg

4.95 runs/team-game

Guggenberger LegionäreREG / DBL#1

1st

73.3%

Top 2

89.2%

2.29

TPM / PFI

65 / 5.68

Host favorite with the best combined top-two profile in the field.

1949 Parma Baseball Club A.S.D.PAR / Serie A#2

1st

16.6%

Top 2

63.4%

1.57

TPM / PFI

63 / 5.39

Pitching-first challenger and the main table threat to Regensburg.

Draci BrnoDRA / CEX#3

1st

8.6%

Top 2

34.4%

1.35

TPM / PFI

60 / 5.19

Benchmark-pressure team with real top-two routes if early leverage breaks right.

Oosterhout TwinsTWI / HDK#4

1st

1.5%

Top 2

13%

0.79

TPM / PFI

61 / 5.16

Long price with enough live-form bats to disrupt a favorite script.

Rank	Team	1st	Top 2	xW	TPM / PFI	PFI conf	Roster cov	Domestic hit/pitch	EU hit/pitch	Read
#1	RegensburgREG / DBL	73.3%	89.2%	2.29	65 / 5.68	82%	59%	106.4 / 130.6	111.1 / 132.7	Host favorite with the best combined top-two profile in the field.
#2	ParmaPAR / Serie A	16.6%	63.4%	1.57	63 / 5.39	84%	79%	101.8 / 118.0	98.2 / 125.0	Pitching-first challenger and the main table threat to Regensburg.
#3	DraciDRA / CEX	8.6%	34.4%	1.35	60 / 5.19	75%	59%	103.8 / 110.2	107.6 / 110.3	Benchmark-pressure team with real top-two routes if early leverage breaks right.
#4	TwinsTWI / HDK	1.5%	13%	0.79	61 / 5.16	77%	64%	101.9 / 102.4	96.1 / 101.0	Long price with enough live-form bats to disrupt a favorite script.

Game board

All 12 round-robin games with model lean and score shape

Leans are not certainty lines. Use this board to spot where one upset can flatten each group.

ROT

Rotterdam Group game board

2026-05-22 14:00

Lean Heidenheim

Heidenheim at Nettuno

59.5%

NET 4.3 - HDH 5.8

TPM +2.0, PFI +0.19, EU hit +14.8 for Heidenheim.

2026-05-22 19:00

Lean Tenerife

Neptunus at Tenerife

64.3%

MAR 7.7 - NEP 4.7

EU hit +34.0 and EU pitch +9.1 for Tenerife.

2026-05-23 14:00

Lean Tenerife

Tenerife at Nettuno

84.3%

NET 2.9 - MAR 11.0

TPM +11.0 and EU hit +50.9 drive the biggest edge in Rotterdam.

2026-05-23 19:00

Lean Neptunus

Heidenheim at Neptunus

67.1%

NEP 6.9 - HDH 4.0

TPM +8.0, PFI +0.28, EU pitch +18.9 for Neptunus.

2026-05-24 12:00

Lean Tenerife

Tenerife at Heidenheim

78.6%

HDH 3.9 - MAR 10.9

TPM +9.0 and EU hit +36.1 keep Tenerife ahead.

2026-05-24 17:00

Lean Neptunus

Nettuno at Neptunus

74.8%

NEP 6.9 - NET 3.0

TPM +10.0 and EU hit +16.9 for the host-side challenger.

Game	Start	Matchup	Lean	Win %	Projected score	Driver
G1	2026-05-22 14:00	Heidenheim at Nettuno	HeidenheimHDH / DBL	59.5%	NET 4.3 - HDH 5.8	TPM +2.0, PFI +0.19, EU hit +14.8 for Heidenheim.
G2	2026-05-22 19:00	Neptunus at Tenerife	TenerifeMAR / ESP	64.3%	MAR 7.7 - NEP 4.7	EU hit +34.0 and EU pitch +9.1 for Tenerife.
G3	2026-05-23 14:00	Tenerife at Nettuno	TenerifeMAR / ESP	84.3%	NET 2.9 - MAR 11.0	TPM +11.0 and EU hit +50.9 drive the biggest edge in Rotterdam.
G4	2026-05-23 19:00	Heidenheim at Neptunus	NeptunusNEP / HDK	67.1%	NEP 6.9 - HDH 4.0	TPM +8.0, PFI +0.28, EU pitch +18.9 for Neptunus.
G5	2026-05-24 12:00	Tenerife at Heidenheim	TenerifeMAR / ESP	78.6%	HDH 3.9 - MAR 10.9	TPM +9.0 and EU hit +36.1 keep Tenerife ahead.
G6	2026-05-24 17:00	Nettuno at Neptunus	NeptunusNEP / HDK	74.8%	NEP 6.9 - NET 3.0	TPM +10.0 and EU hit +16.9 for the host-side challenger.

REG

Regensburg Group game board

2026-05-22 14:00

Lean Parma

Parma at Draci Brno

55.8%

DRA 4.7 - PAR 5.1

TPM +3.0 and PFI +0.20 for Parma in the benchmark test opener.

2026-05-22 19:00

Lean Regensburg

Oosterhout Twins at Regensburg

84.8%

REG 10.1 - TWI 2.7

TPM +4.0, PFI +0.52, EU hit +15.0 for the host favorite.

2026-05-23 14:00

Lean Parma

Oosterhout Twins at Parma

70.6%

PAR 6.1 - TWI 3.3

Parma prevention edge: EU pitch +24.0.

2026-05-23 19:00

Lean Regensburg

Regensburg at Draci Brno

74.4%

DRA 3.8 - REG 8.3

TPM +5.0 and EU pitch +22.4 for Regensburg.

2026-05-24 11:00

Lean Draci

Draci Brno at Oosterhout Twins

65.5%

TWI 3.8 - DRA 6.5

EU hit +11.5 and EU pitch +9.3 for Draci.

2026-05-24 15:30

Lean Regensburg

Regensburg at Parma

69.4%

PAR 3.6 - REG 7.3

TPM +2.0, PFI +0.29, EU hit +12.9 for Regensburg.

Game	Start	Matchup	Lean	Win %	Projected score	Driver
G1	2026-05-22 14:00	Parma at Draci Brno	ParmaPAR / Serie A	55.8%	DRA 4.7 - PAR 5.1	TPM +3.0 and PFI +0.20 for Parma in the benchmark test opener.
G2	2026-05-22 19:00	Oosterhout Twins at Regensburg	RegensburgREG / DBL	84.8%	REG 10.1 - TWI 2.7	TPM +4.0, PFI +0.52, EU hit +15.0 for the host favorite.
G3	2026-05-23 14:00	Oosterhout Twins at Parma	ParmaPAR / Serie A	70.6%	PAR 6.1 - TWI 3.3	Parma prevention edge: EU pitch +24.0.
G4	2026-05-23 19:00	Regensburg at Draci Brno	RegensburgREG / DBL	74.4%	DRA 3.8 - REG 8.3	TPM +5.0 and EU pitch +22.4 for Regensburg.
G5	2026-05-24 11:00	Draci Brno at Oosterhout Twins	DraciDRA / CEX	65.5%	TWI 3.8 - DRA 6.5	EU hit +11.5 and EU pitch +9.3 for Draci.
G6	2026-05-24 15:30	Regensburg at Parma	RegensburgREG / DBL	69.4%	PAR 3.6 - REG 7.3	TPM +2.0, PFI +0.29, EU hit +12.9 for Regensburg.

Team files

Eight team files: route, translation, and current-form leaders

Compact team dossiers with forecast line, benchmark read, route board, and current-form cluster.

Tenerife MarlinsMAR / ESPROT

1st

70.8%

Top 2

89.3%

2.27

PFI

5.82

Domestic profile

Record

16-0

RS/G

12.2

RA/G

0.9

OPS

1.146

ERA

0.85

WHIP

0.77

Benchmark translation

Domestic hit/pitch

122.9/147.1

EU hit/pitch

146.9/142.0

both bats and prevention clear continental baseline.

TPM profile

TPM

Off

Def

Speed

Pitch depth

41.4

Top-3 IP share

84%

Current-form signal

PFI

5.82

Trend

-0.02

Confidence

73%

Sample rows

Roster coverage

Baseline

83.1

Coverage

49%

Proxy roster match for current phase.

Route board

G2 vs NEP

64.3%

G3 vs NET

84.3%

G5 vs HDH

78.6%

Top current-form cluster

SILVA MUGUERZA Elio Eduardo

PFI

7.4

GUILLEN DIAZ Pablo Luis

PFI

7.3

ENCARNACION SEGURA Wander Joel

PFI

6.7

VALERIO ABREU Edison Damian

PFI

6.7

Curacao Neptunus RotterdamNEP / HDKROT

1st

22.5%

Top 2

73.5%

1.78

PFI

5.76

Domestic profile

Record

15-0

RS/G

6.8

RA/G

1.5

OPS

0.862

ERA

1.13

WHIP

0.87

Benchmark translation

Domestic hit/pitch

119.4/135.3

EU hit/pitch

112.9/132.9

prevention layer holds and bat signal still clears EU baseline.

TPM profile

TPM

Off

Def

Speed

Pitch depth

51.5

Top-3 IP share

74%

Current-form signal

PFI

5.76

Trend

-0.18

Confidence

76%

Sample rows

Roster coverage

Baseline

62.7

Coverage

66%

Proxy roster match for current phase.

Route board

G2 vs MAR

35.7%

G4 vs HDH

67.1%

G6 vs NET

74.8%

Top current-form cluster

SULBARAN Juancarlos

PFI

7.9

POSTELMANS Koen

PFI

7.8

MARTIS Shairon

PFI

7.2

DIAZ Christian

PFI

6.4

Heidenheim HeideköpfeHDH / DBLROT

1st

5.1%

Top 2

24.0%

1.14

PFI

5.48

Domestic profile

Record

10-2

RS/G

8.8

RA/G

4.2

OPS

0.804

ERA

3.62

WHIP

1.22

Benchmark translation

Domestic hit/pitch

108.2/113.0

EU hit/pitch

110.8/114.0

profile stays above benchmark, but upset dependence is high.

TPM profile

TPM

Off

Def

Speed

Pitch depth

51.5

Top-3 IP share

74%

Current-form signal

PFI

5.48

Trend

-0.15

Confidence

76%

Sample rows

Roster coverage

Baseline

65.7

Coverage

54%

Proxy roster match for current phase.

Route board

G1 vs NET

59.5%

G4 vs NEP

32.9%

G5 vs MAR

21.4%

Top current-form cluster

Wi. Germaine

PFI

7.5

Os. Syren

PFI

6.6

Ga. Owens

PFI

6.5

Al. Sanabia

PFI

6.5

A.S.D. Nettuno B.C. 1945NET / Serie AROT

1st

1.6%

Top 2

13.1%

0.81

PFI

5.29

Domestic profile

Record

8-4

RS/G

5.5

RA/G

4.2

OPS

0.722

ERA

3.74

WHIP

1.34

Benchmark translation

Domestic hit/pitch

101.2/106.6

EU hit/pitch

96.0/114.3

prevention keeps Nettuno live in low-run scripts.

TPM profile

TPM

Off

Def

Speed

Pitch depth

68.1

Top-3 IP share

57%

Current-form signal

PFI

5.29

Trend

-0.16

Confidence

83%

Sample rows

Roster coverage

Baseline

56.8

Coverage

86%

Proxy roster match for current phase.

Route board

G1 vs HDH

40.5%

G3 vs MAR

15.7%

G6 vs NEP

25.2%

Top current-form cluster

LOPEZ NUNEZ Porfirio Antonio

PFI

6.6

BATISTA DE JESUS Nathanael Manoly

PFI

6.4

ANNUNZIATA NINO Andres Antonio

PFI

6.1

ZAZZA Manuel

PFI

5.7

Guggenberger LegionäreREG / DBLREG

1st

73.3%

Top 2

89.2%

2.29

PFI

5.68

Domestic profile

Record

9-3

RS/G

7.5

RA/G

2.3

OPS

0.818

ERA

2.06

WHIP

0.95

Benchmark translation

Domestic hit/pitch

106.4/130.6

EU hit/pitch

111.1/132.7

clean two-way favorite profile with host lift.

TPM profile

TPM

Off

Def

Speed

Pitch depth

58.2

Top-3 IP share

67%

Current-form signal

PFI

5.68

Trend

+0.12

Confidence

82%

Sample rows

Roster coverage

Baseline

58.1

Coverage

59%

Proxy roster match for current phase.

Route board

G2 vs TWI

84.8%

G4 vs DRA

74.4%

G6 vs PAR

69.4%

Top current-form cluster

Ch. Rummel Pedrol

PFI

8.2

Ni. Sacasa Petzsch

PFI

6.5

Le. Tavarez

PFI

6.5

Al. Schmidt

PFI

6.1

1949 Parma Baseball Club A.S.D.PAR / Serie AREG

1st

16.6%

Top 2

63.4%

1.57

PFI

5.39

Domestic profile

Record

8-2

RS/G

5.8

RA/G

3.6

OPS

0.694

ERA

3.05

WHIP

1.11

Benchmark translation

Domestic hit/pitch

101.8/118.0

EU hit/pitch

98.2/125.0

pitching-first challenger with a real low-run route.

TPM profile

TPM

Off

Def

Speed

Pitch depth

62.6

Top-3 IP share

62%

Current-form signal

PFI

5.39

Trend

-0.06

Confidence

84%

Sample rows

Roster coverage

Baseline

63.3

Coverage

79%

Proxy roster match for current phase.

Route board

G1 vs DRA

55.8%

G3 vs TWI

70.6%

G6 vs REG

30.6%

Top current-form cluster

ANGIOI Gabriele

PFI

7.3

FIGUEREDO CRUZ Raymond

PFI

6.4

SCOTTI Claudio

PFI

6.2

BOCCHI Matteo

PFI

6.1

Draci BrnoDRA / CEXREG

1st

8.6%

Top 2

34.4%

1.35

PFI

5.19

Domestic profile

Record

12-4

RS/G

7.1

RA/G

4.3

OPS

0.791

ERA

3.37

WHIP

1.38

Benchmark translation

Domestic hit/pitch

103.8/110.2

EU hit/pitch

107.6/110.3

solid two-way benchmark pressure team.

TPM profile

TPM

Off

Def

Speed

Pitch depth

64.8

Top-3 IP share

60%

Current-form signal

PFI

5.19

Trend

-0.17

Confidence

75%

Sample rows

Roster coverage

Baseline

59.0

Coverage

59%

Proxy roster match for current phase.

Route board

G1 vs PAR

44.2%

G4 vs REG

25.6%

G5 vs TWI

65.5%

Top current-form cluster

PROKOP Milan

PFI

6.2

LOPEZ Aliangel

PFI

6.1

COLINA Jose

PFI

6.1

ONDRA Tomas

PFI

6.0

Oosterhout TwinsTWI / HDKREG

1st

1.5%

Top 2

13.0%

0.79

PFI

5.16

Domestic profile

Record

6-8

RS/G

3.8

RA/G

4.8

OPS

0.682

ERA

4.74

WHIP

1.52

Benchmark translation

Domestic hit/pitch

101.9/102.4

EU hit/pitch

96.1/101.0

route requires disruption, not straight baseline trading.

TPM profile

TPM

Off

Def

Speed

Pitch depth

57.6

Top-3 IP share

67%

Current-form signal

PFI

5.16

Trend

+0.24

Confidence

77%

Sample rows

Roster coverage

Baseline

55.4

Coverage

64%

Proxy roster match for current phase.

Route board

G2 vs REG

15.2%

G3 vs PAR

29.4%

G5 vs DRA

34.5%

Top current-form cluster

ANGELA Nelmerson

PFI

7.5

MOSTAERT Nando

PFI

6.4

PALLER Rob

PFI

6.1

ISHIKAWA Ayumu

PFI

6.0

Swing points

The highest-leverage pre-event games by group

ROT

Rotterdam Group

G2 (Tenerife vs Neptunus) is the first-day control game. Tenerife can separate the table; Neptunus can flatten the group immediately with a host-side upset.

G1 (Nettuno vs Heidenheim) likely sets elimination pressure. The loser is pushed toward a two-upset weekend.

G4 (Neptunus vs Heidenheim) is the probable top-two gate if Tenerife handles early business.

G6 (Neptunus vs Nettuno) can become tiebreak-control baseball if the table compresses.

REG

Regensburg Group

G1 (Draci vs Parma) is the pure benchmark test and immediately pressures the loser into a chase route.

G2 (Regensburg vs Oosterhout) is host-control leverage: a Regensburg win protects table management early.

G4 (Draci vs Regensburg) is likely the highest-leverage top-two gate if favorites hold Friday.

G6 (Parma vs Regensburg) can become final-slot tiebreak control if Regensburg enters 1-1.

Analyst angles

Publication-ready framing from both packets

Favorite lanes are real, not decorative

Tenerife and Regensburg lead because their benchmark translation survives both domestic and EU layers. This is strength + route quality, not just record chasing.

Prevention is the upset tax

Parma, Neptunus, and Nettuno all carry viable low-run disruption scripts. Favorites stay favorites by avoiding extra high-leverage innings, not by assuming clean game states.

Pressure teams can flatten each group

Heidenheim and Draci do not need to dominate three games. One upset in the right slot can move the group from a favorite curve into tiebreak compression.

PFI watch board is an operations layer

Sulbaran/Postelmans in Rotterdam and Rummel Pedrol/Angela in Regensburg are not narrative flourishes. They are current-form pressure points that can re-shape reliever usage and leverage order by game two.

Sources and method

Built from official WBSC context and Statbase benchmark translation

Audit trail

Report built from the two analyst packets generated on May 19, 2026 for BCL Rotterdam and BCL Regensburg. Model stack: Statbase internal tournament math, Team Power Model, Player Form Index, benchmark translation, run environment, and pitch-depth stress.

The player layer is currently proxy-roster based because WBSC roster tables were not published at generation time. Re-run when official roster tables are available for final pre-game publication.

Tournament decision stack

Move from pre-event forecast to live tournament control

The full Statbase platform gives clubs and federations the live player database behind reports like this: roster filters, form leaderboards, team comparisons, private notes, and decision-grade exports for staff.

Request access Open app